Close

Lubyani ta tekhnichni kultury

 Vol.6 (11), 2018

ISSN 2307–6429

DOI: 10.48096/btc.2018.6(11).66-80

CONDITIONS OF DEVELOPMENT OF WEEDS, PESTS AND DISEASES IN CROPS OF MONOCULTURE OF HEMP, DEPENDING ON FERTILIZER

Myhal Mykola, Laiko Iryna, Mishchenko Serhiy, Kyrychenko Hanna, Laiko Hanna, Biryukova Tetiana
Institute of Bast Crops NAAS

Summary

The article presents the results of studies of the conditions for the development of weeds, pests and diseases in the sowing of hemp monoculture. It was found that hemp is well adapted for growing for a long time in one field, providing a high yield of hemp production. It is recommended to grow a monoculture on fiber (harvesting in the phase of flowering plants). This makes it possible to avoid the ripening of seeds of the bulk of weeds and the main periods of harmfulness of pests and diseases. Differences in the degree of weediness of the field were revealed depending on the form and dose of fertilizers. In areas fertilized with manure, there are more weeds than in areas with introduced fertilizers. The large contamination of the fertilized areas is a consequence of the introduction of viable weed seeds together with manure, which is not properly harvested and stored in field shoulders. With an increase in the dose of manure, the number of weeds increases, and an increase in the dose of mineral fertilizers with which weed seeds are not introduced, on the contrary, decreases as a result of an increase in the height of the stalk and its foliage. This is clearly confirmed by the fact that during the period from 3-4 pairs of leaves and to the phase of flowering plants, a large number of weeds die. Indicated on agrotechnical methods of weed, pest and disease control when growing hemp monoculture.

Keywords:

hemp, growing , yield, monoculture, fertilizer

Language of the article

Ukrainian

References:

Gorodnij N. G. (1960) Vliyanie dlitel’nogo primeneniya udobrenij na agronomicheskie svojstva pochvy i urozhaj konopli i drugix kul’tur, vysevaemyx v konoplyanom sevooborote. Sb. nauchn. trudov VIUA. Moskva. Vyp. 1. S. 85–95.
Gorshkov P. A. & Kravchenko S. N. (1978) Vliyanie dlitel’nogo primeneniya udobrenij na agronomicheskie svojstva i formy azota temno-seryx lesnyx pochv. Nauchnye trudy USXA. Kiev. Vyp. 205. S. 4–9.(rus)
Zhukov M. S. & Hrabovskyi M. P. (1961) Vplyv tryvaloho vnesennia dobryv na zminu osnovnykh vlastyvostei hruntu. Ahrokhimiia i gruntoznavstvo. Kyiv. Urozhai. Vyp. 2. S. 145–158.
Zhukov M. S. & Grabovskij N. P. (1969) Izmenenie fiziko-ximicheskix svojstv i plodorodiya pochvy pri sistematicheskom primenenii navoza i mineral’nyx udobrenij. Agronomicheskie osnovy primeneniya udobrenij pod konoplyu. Sumy. vyp.VNII. S. 124–154.
Nechiporenko O. S. & Repyax I. I. (1969) Vliyanie dlitel’nogo primeneniya udobrenij na urozhaj bessmennoj konopli. Agronomicheskie osnovy primeneniya udobrenij pod konoplyu. Sumy. vyp.VNII. S. 108–123.
Nechiporenko O. S. (1974) Vliyanie izvesti na urozhaj konopli i izmenenie fiziko-ximicheskix svojstv temno-seryx lesnyx pochv. Biologiya, vozdelyvanie i pervichnaya obrabotka konopli. Gluxov. Vyp. 36. S. 138–146.
Shatun B. I. & Nechyporenko O. S. (1994) Vplyv dovhostrokovoho vnesennia hnoiu i mineralnykh dobryv na humusnyi stan, kyslotnyi rezhym hruntu ta produktyvnist konopel. Selektsiia i pervynna obrobka konopel ta lonu. Hlukhiv. S. 57–69.
Veselovskyi I. V., Lysenko A. K. & Manko Yu. V. (1988) Atlas-vyznachnyk burianiv. Kyiv. Urozhai. 69 s.
Myhal M. D., Kmets I. L. & Laiko I. M. (2017) Trykhomy i kanabinoidy konopel. Do teorii selektsii nenarkotychnykh sortiv. Sumy. FOP Shcherbyna I. V. 227 s.
Tkalich P. P. (1978) Vrediteli i bolezni konopli i mery bor’by s nimi. Konoplya. G. I. Senchenko, M. A. Timonina (Ed).. Moskva. Kolos. S. 187–206.
Chuchvaha V. I. (2011) Shkidnyky i khvoroby. Konopli. M. D. Myhalia, V. M. Kabantsia (Ed). Sumy. Ellada. S. 216–229.

Published:

November 2018

Online:

02.03.2020